The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same four filters from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ABG · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
On the watchlist
RUSHA · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
| Measure | ABG | RUSHA | RTX | FLWS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 52 (highest) | 52 (highest) | 52 (highest) | 52 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 3 | 31 | 81 (highest) | 69 |
| Returns on capital | 71 (highest) | 57 | 8 | 49 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 49 | 69 (highest) | 69 (highest) | 28 |
| Capital discipline | 98 (highest) | 60 | 56 | 54 |
| Margin of safety | 28% below value (highest margin of safety) | 43% above value | No price data | 162% above value |
| Market cap | $4.2B | $6.2B | — | $262.2M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |