The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same four filters from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

QVCDQ · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

40/ 100
Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

CHGG · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

41/ 100
Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

CVU · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

41/ 100
Shallow moat

On the watchlist

PLBY · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

40/ 100
Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureQVCDQCHGGCVUPLBY
Moat Score (0–100)4041 (highest)41 (highest)40
Pricing power6091 (highest)086
Returns on capital261183 (highest)0
Balance-sheet safety282855 (highest)28
Capital discipline44 (highest)242444 (highest)
Margin of safetyNo price dataNo price data33% below valueNo price data
Market cap$90.6M$58.3M$132.0M
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filings as ofFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025
QVCDQ vs CHGG vs CVU vs PLBY — Moat Score Comparison · Buy Like Buffett