The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same four filters from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
RUSHA · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
| Measure | RUSHA | GCO | LCII | RTX |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 52 | 53 (highest) | 52 | 52 |
| Pricing power | 31 | 68 | 39 | 81 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 57 | 17 | 58 (highest) | 8 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 69 | 100 (highest) | 45 | 69 |
| Capital discipline | 60 | 40 | 72 (highest) | 56 |
| Margin of safety | 43% above value | No price data | 8% below value (highest margin of safety) | No price data |
| Market cap | $6.2B | — | $2.6B | — |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |