The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same four filters from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

SENS · Healthcare · No moat

16/ 100
No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

FCUV · Healthcare · No moat

16/ 100
No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

RXRX · Healthcare · No moat

16/ 100
No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

PLSE · Healthcare · No moat

16/ 100
No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureSENSFCUVRXRXPLSE
Moat Score (0–100)16 (highest)16 (highest)16 (highest)16 (highest)
Pricing power0 (highest)0 (highest)0 (highest)0 (highest)
Returns on capital0 (highest)0 (highest)0 (highest)0 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety55 (highest)55 (highest)55 (highest)55 (highest)
Capital discipline24 (highest)24 (highest)24 (highest)24 (highest)
Margin of safetyNo price dataNo price dataNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$210.9M$2.5M$1.6B$1.9B
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filings as ofFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025
SENS vs FCUV vs RXRX vs PLSE — Moat Score Comparison · Buy Like Buffett