Alibaba Group Holding Limited
BABA · Technology · FY filings · Not rated ·
Not rated
We don't have enough comparable filing data to score BABA on every filter, so we don't publish a composite. Missing: pricingPower, returnsOnCapital, balanceSheet, capitalDiscipline.
Fundamentals
There's no normalized fundamentals series for BABA yet — it appears once ingest has processed its filings.
Moat Score history
No composite readings yet — BABA’s filings don’t give the engine enough comparable data to score, and we log that honestly instead of guessing a number.
Tier changesSame-methodology crossings of the Wide / Narrow / Shallow bars
None yet — BABA hasn't been rated on any logged capture, so there's no tier to change from.
Scores are logged append-only and never overwritten — this record can’t be backfilled, which is exactly why it’s worth keeping.
Track record
How Alibaba Group Holding Limited’s moat rated in each of the years we can reconstruct from its filings — scored only on what was knowable at the time — and what its price and returns did afterward. The score never saw a price; the two are joined only in hindsight, for education, not as a signal.
How to read this: each dot is what the engine would have scored BABA on that December 31; the line below is its total-return price path (dividends reinvested) in the years since.
Two tracks, one timeline: the score has its own 0–100 scale (top), the price its own 100-based scale (bottom) — never a shared axis. The indexed price path isn't available for this company yet; gaps in the score line are years with no reconstructed rating (see the table for why). The Table view carries every value.
What followed, in the years it rated Wide
In the reconstructed history shown, BABA did not rate Wide-moat in any year, so there is no wide-moat track record to report. That absence is itself the honest answer — we don’t manufacture a comparison where the rating never earned one.
Technology context
Not ranked — BABA doesn’t have enough comparable filing data for a composite score, so we don’t place it on the board.
Technology leaders by Moat Score
- #1FTNT FORTINET, INC.100.0 out of 100, Wide moatWide moat
- #2META Meta Platforms, Inc.99.3 out of 100, Wide moatWide moat
- #3MCO Moody’s Corporation98.8 out of 100, Wide moatWide moat
Common questions about BABA
- Does Alibaba Group Holding Limited have an economic moat?
- We don't publish a Moat Score for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA): its SEC filings don't provide enough comparable data to score every filter, and the Index records that gap rather than a guessed number. Missing inputs: pricing power, returns on capital, balance-sheet safety, capital discipline.
- How has BABA's Moat Score changed over time?
- The record logs 7 readings since Jul 17, 2026, none with a composite — BABA hasn't had enough comparable filing data to score. No tier changes on record yet. The history is append-only — readings are only ever added, never rewritten.