THE CRYPTO COMPANY
CRCW · Technology · $5.1M mkt cap · FY2025 filings · Shallow moat ·
Doesn't clear the bar
The five investor questions
2018–2025: revenue 5000.00 to 18527.00, increasing; diluted EPS -0.60 to -0.00, increasing. 1 fiscal year was not jointly reported; CAGR uses the full 7-year elapsed span. Diluted EPS was derived from net income and diluted weighted-average shares in 4 years where the direct tag was absent. Latest-filed diluted EPS remains usable for Business Trend, but an integer share-count change lacks enough evidence to confirm a comparable EPS basis; valuation growth therefore stays at 0%.
Median gross margin 53.6% over 7y, variable.
Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital.
Net debt/EBITDA n/ax, interest coverage -3x.
Owner earnings trend unclear, share count n/a.
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
Price vs. owner-earnings value range
- Owner earnings (normalized)
- —
- Value range / share
- —
- Conservative high estimate / share
- —
- Recent price
- $0.00
- Price vs. high estimate
- No price data
Conservative range under moat-index@2.0.0: low end 11.1×, high end capped at 18×; 9% discount rate; high-end growth 0% (capped at 4%) using min(5y revenue CAGR, 5y diluted-EPS CAGR), clamped to 0%–4%; maintenance capex uses min(capex, D&A); abstain when D&A is unavailable. This is a disclosed model range, not intrinsic value as fact.
12 years of fundamentals
The business, in plain English
THE CRYPTO COMPANY booked $18527 of revenue in FY2025 in the Technology sector and kept 100.0% of it as gross profit — a high-margin business by that measure. After every other cost, −10693.2% of each revenue dollar reached the bottom line.
Across the filed record, revenue grew from $308 (FY2015) to $18527 (FY2025) — about 50.6% a year compounded over 10 years.
CRCW's filings don't disclose total debt in a form the methodology can use, so leverage is treated as unmeasured — never assumed to be zero.
The share count rose 50482.9% between FY2015 and FY2025 — existing owners have been diluted over the record. Capital Discipline scores it 44/100.
This breakdown is generated from the filed numbers and sub-scores above — no outside narrative, no estimates. Where a filing doesn’t disclose an input, the sentence that would need it is omitted instead of guessed.
Gaps in a line mean that item isn’t in CRCW’s filings for that year — the series is never interpolated or estimated. The Table view lists every filed value, including operating and net margins, total debt, and share count.
Moat Score history
Tier changesSame-methodology crossings of the Wide / Narrow / Shallow bars
- Methodology upgraded moat-index@1.2.0tomoat-index@2.0.0 — readings across versions aren’t comparedJul 20, 2026
Scores are logged append-only and never overwritten — this record can’t be backfilled, which is exactly why it’s worth keeping.
Track record
How THE CRYPTO COMPANY’s moat rated in each of the years we can reconstruct from its filings — scored only on what was knowable at the time — and what its price and returns did afterward. The score never saw a price; the two are joined only in hindsight, for education, not as a signal.
How to read this: each dot is what the engine would have scored CRCW on that December 31; the line below is its total-return price path (dividends reinvested) in the years since.
Two tracks, one timeline: the score has its own 0–100 scale (top), the price its own 100-based scale (bottom) — never a shared axis. The price path is a total-return (dividends reinvested) index built from the same data the forward returns use; gaps in the score line are years with no reconstructed rating (see the table for why). The Table view carries every value.
What followed, in the years it rated Wide
In the reconstructed history shown, CRCW did not rate Wide-moat in any year, so there is no wide-moat track record to report. That absence is itself the honest answer — we don’t manufacture a comparison where the rating never earned one.
Technology context
#389 of 745 scored Technology companies, ranked by Moat Score.
Nearest peers by Moat Score
- #387NCNO nCino, Inc.44.8 out of 100, Shallow moatShallow moat
- #388EFOR Everforth, Inc.44.6 out of 100, Shallow moatShallow moat
- #390NXTT NEXT TECHNOLOGY HOLDING INC.44.5 out of 100, Shallow moatShallow moat
- #391KWIK KwikClick, Inc.44.5 out of 100, Shallow moatShallow moat
Compare CRCW with its nearest peers →All Technology companies on the Index →
Common questions about CRCW
- Does THE CRYPTO COMPANY have an economic moat?
- Based on its FY2025 SEC filings, the Moat Index scores THE CRYPTO COMPANY (CRCW) 44.6 out of 100 — a Shallow moat. The five questions behind that score begin at 20% each; if exactly one genuinely lacks data, the other four weights are renormalized and disclosed. revenue and EPS trend 47, pricing power 60, returns on capital not measurable from the filings, balance-sheet safety 28, capital discipline 44.
- How has CRCW's Moat Score changed over time?
- The record logs 8 readings since Jul 17, 2026; the latest reads 44.6 out of 100 (shallow moat). No tier changes on record yet. (A methodology upgrade on Jul 20, 2026 re-based the score; readings across engine versions aren't compared.) The history is append-only — readings are only ever added, never rewritten.