Phillips 66

PSX · Energy · $82.9B mkt cap · FY2025 filings · Not rated ·

Price verdict withheld — owner-earnings floor unreliable

Not rated
Share / Embed this score
Embed this result

We don't have enough comparable filing data to score at least four of the five filters for PSX, so we don't publish a composite. Missing: returnsOnCapital, balanceSheet. No composite: 2 components abstained (returnsOnCapital: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital.; balanceSheet: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet.).

17 years of fundamentals

The business, in plain English

Phillips 66 booked $132.4B of revenue in FY2025 in the Energy sector and kept 12.3% of it as gross profit — a thin-margin business by that measure. After every other cost, 3.3% of each revenue dollar reached the bottom line.

Across the filed record, revenue shrank from $146.6B (FY2010) to $132.4B (FY2025) — about −0.7% a year compounded over 15 years.

The balance sheet carried $19.5B of total debt in FY2025 against $4.4B of owner earnings — roughly 4.4 years of owner earnings to retire it all.

This breakdown is generated from the filed numbers and sub-scores above — no outside narrative, no estimates. Where a filing doesn’t disclose an input, the sentence that would need it is omitted instead of guessed.

FY2009–FY2025 · 17 fiscal years, normalized from PSX’s SEC filings

RevenueSales, as filed$132.4B FY2025
$0$100B$200B2009201520212025
Gross marginRevenue kept after cost of goods12.3% FY2025
0%10%20%2009201520212025
Return on invested capitalOperating profit on the capital employed

Not disclosed in PSX’s filings for these years — we don’t estimate it.

Owner earningsCash an owner could take out$4.4B FY2025
$0$10B2009201520212025

Gaps in a line mean that item isn’t in PSX’s filings for that year — the series is never interpolated or estimated. The Table view lists every filed value, including operating and net margins, total debt, and share count.

Moat Score history

16 logged readings since Jul 17, 2026 · append-only, never rewritten

Moat Score over timeLast scored reading of each day, on the 0–100 scale

No composite readings yet — PSX’s filings don’t give the engine enough comparable data to score, and we log that honestly instead of guessing a number.

Tier changesSame-methodology crossings of the Wide / Narrow / Shallow bars

  1. Normalizer upgraded unstamped (version unknown)tomoat-xbrl-normalizer@1.1.0 — readings across versions aren’t comparedJul 26, 2026
  2. Methodology upgraded moat-index@2.0.0tomoat-index@3.0.0 — readings across versions aren’t comparedJul 23, 2026
  3. Methodology upgraded moat-index@1.2.0tomoat-index@2.0.0 — readings across versions aren’t comparedJul 20, 2026

Scores are logged append-only and never overwritten — this record can’t be backfilled, which is exactly why it’s worth keeping.

Track record

How Phillips 66’s moat rated in each of the years we can reconstruct from its filings — scored only on what was knowable at the time — and what its price and returns did afterward. The score never saw a price; the two are joined only in hindsight, for education, not as a signal.

As-of scores 20122025, one methodology version · reconstructed from filings on file each Dec 31 — never with hindsight

As-of Moat Score (dot colored by tier)Indexed price (total-return (dividends reinvested))Rated Wide-moat that year

How to read this: each dot is what the engine would have scored PSX on that December 31; the line below is its total-return price path (dividends reinvested) in the years since.

0406080100WideNarrowShallowNo moatAs-of Moat Score100Indexed price · log scale 201220152018202120242025

Two tracks, one timeline: the score has its own 0–100 scale (top), the price its own 100-based scale (bottom) — never a shared axis. The indexed price path isn't available for this company yet; gaps in the score line are years with no reconstructed rating (see the table for why). The Table view carries every value.

What followed, in the years it rated Wide

In the reconstructed history shown, PSX did not rate Wide-moat in any year, so there is no wide-moat track record to report. That absence is itself the honest answer — we don’t manufacture a comparison where the rating never earned one.

Energy context

Not ranked — PSX doesn’t have enough comparable filing data for a composite score, so we don’t place it on the board.

Energy leaders by Moat Score

  1. #1COP CONOCOPHILLIPS74.5 out of 100, Narrow moatNarrow moat
  2. #2CVX Chevron Corp63.3 out of 100, Narrow moatNarrow moat
  3. #3VVV VALVOLINE INC.60.1 out of 100, Narrow moatNarrow moat

All Energy companies on the Index →

Common questions about PSX

Does Phillips 66 have an economic moat?
We don't publish a Moat Score for Phillips 66 (PSX): its SEC filings don't provide enough comparable data to score at least four of the five filters, and the Index records each gap rather than a guessed number. Missing inputs: returns on capital, balance-sheet safety.
Is PSX trading below the conservative owner-earnings estimate?
The conservative owner-earnings floor is $122.08 per share. It capitalizes normalized owner earnings at a 9% rate and assumes 0% growth. Versus a recent price of $206.77, that is 69% above owner-earnings floor. The model also publishes a capped-growth comparison, but the floor is the cautious baseline. It assumes trailing owner earnings persist and is unreliable for declining businesses. This is an educational estimate from primary SEC filings, not intrinsic value as a fact or investment advice.
How has PSX's Moat Score changed over time?
The record logs 16 readings since Jul 17, 2026, none with a composite — PSX hasn't had enough comparable filing data to score. No tier changes on record yet. (Methodology or normalizer upgrades on Jul 20, 2026, Jul 23, 2026, Jul 26, 2026 re-based the score; readings across versions aren't compared.) The history is append-only — readings are only ever added, never rewritten.