TransDigm Group Incorporated
TDG · Consumer Discretionary · FY2025 filings · Narrow moat ·
On the watchlist
The five investor questions
2021–2025 (latest 5 aligned FYs; v3 window cap 5): revenue $4.8B to $8.8B, increasing; diluted EPS 10.41 to 32.08, increasing.
Median gross margin 56.9% over 10y, very stable.
Median ROIC 14.1%, above the 12% hurdle in 100% of years.
Net debt/EBITDA 5.8x, no material interest expense disclosed.
Owner earnings +14.3%/yr, share count n/a.
Price vs. conservative owner-earnings floor
A cautious baseline, not a price target: what the shares may support if normalized owner earnings simply hold steady.
- Owner earnings (normalized)
- $1.4B
- Owner-earnings floor / share
- Unavailable — insufficient owner-earnings data
- Capped-growth comparison / share
- Unavailable — insufficient growth-model data
- Recent price
- $1236.71
- Price vs. owner-earnings floor
- No price data
This floor assumes trailing owner earnings persist — unreliable for declining businesses. The recent FY revenue series does not trigger the three-consecutive-declines flag.
Cohort context: median current price is 239% above the floor across 48 of the current top 50 companies by Moat Score with both values.
Score records captured Jul 26, 2026.
Exactly which 50 companies?
FTNT, META, MEDP, IBEX, MSFT, GOOGL, LULU, ANF, IDXX, TXRH, FHI, QLYS, FFIV, ADBE, LLY, MANH, VEEV, GRMN, SSD, MNST, DOCS, MCO, CPRT, NTAP, LRCX, NVDA, CORT, SFM, MPTI, ULTA, SN, RMD, ROL, PAYC, IRMD, INTU, DECK, MORN, LGCY, DAL, GWW, ISRG, MPWR, CTAS, LOPE, MRK, CMG, FAST, BKNG, ORLY
Missing a usable price or floor: ANF, BKNG.
Model details under moat-index@3.0.0: zero-growth floor 11.1×, capped-growth comparison at no more than 18×; 9% discount rate; high-end growth 4% (capped at 4%) using min(5y revenue CAGR, 5y diluted-EPS CAGR), clamped to 0%–4%; maintenance capex uses min(capex, D&A); abstain when D&A is unavailable. This is a disclosed model range, not intrinsic value as fact.
19 years of fundamentals
The business, in plain English
TransDigm Group Incorporated booked $8.8B of revenue in FY2025 in the Consumer Discretionary sector and kept 60.1% of it as gross profit — a high-margin business by that measure. After every other cost, 23.5% of each revenue dollar reached the bottom line.
Across the filed record, revenue grew from $714M (FY2008) to $8.8B (FY2025) — about 15.9% a year compounded over 17 years.
It earned 19.6% on invested capital in the latest filed year, FY2025. Across the full 18-year measurable filed record, median ROIC was 13.2%. Over the v3 recent window (10 measurable filed years), median ROIC was 14.1%. The Returns on Capital filter above scores it 75/100.
The balance sheet carried $29.3B of total debt in FY2025 against $2.2B of owner earnings — roughly 13.2 years of owner earnings to retire it all. Balance-Sheet Safety scores it 40/100.
Put together: Business Trend is the strongest of the five filters (100/100) and Balance-Sheet Safety the weakest (40/100), which is how TDG lands at 78/100 — a Narrow moat.
This breakdown is generated from the filed numbers and sub-scores above — no outside narrative, no estimates. Where a filing doesn’t disclose an input, the sentence that would need it is omitted instead of guessed.
Gaps in a line mean that item isn’t in TDG’s filings for that year — the series is never interpolated or estimated. The Table view lists every filed value, including operating and net margins, total debt, and share count.
Moat Score history
Breaks in the line mark methodology or normalizer upgrades — readings across versions aren’t compared, so a level shift there isn’t a change in the business.
Tier changesSame-methodology crossings of the Wide / Narrow / Shallow bars
- Normalizer upgraded unstamped (version unknown)tomoat-xbrl-normalizer@1.1.0 — readings across versions aren’t comparedJul 26, 2026
- Methodology upgraded moat-index@2.0.0tomoat-index@3.0.0 — readings across versions aren’t comparedJul 23, 2026
- Methodology upgraded moat-index@1.2.0tomoat-index@2.0.0 — readings across versions aren’t comparedJul 20, 2026
Scores are logged append-only and never overwritten — this record can’t be backfilled, which is exactly why it’s worth keeping.
Track record
How TransDigm Group Incorporated’s moat rated in each of the years we can reconstruct from its filings — scored only on what was knowable at the time — and what its price and returns did afterward. The score never saw a price; the two are joined only in hindsight, for education, not as a signal.
How to read this: each dot is what the engine would have scored TDG on that December 31; the line below is its total-return price path (dividends reinvested) in the years since.
Two tracks, one timeline: the score has its own 0–100 scale (top), the price its own 100-based scale (bottom) — never a shared axis. The price path is a total-return (dividends reinvested) index built from the same data the forward returns use; gaps in the score line are years with no reconstructed rating (see the table for why). The Table view carries every value.
What followed, in the years it rated Wide
In the reconstructed history shown, TDG did not rate Wide-moat in any year, so there is no wide-moat track record to report. That absence is itself the honest answer — we don’t manufacture a comparison where the rating never earned one.
Consumer Discretionary context
#50 of 487 scored Consumer Discretionary companies, ranked by Moat Score.
Nearest peers by Moat Score
- #48TJX THE TJX COMPANIES, INC.77.8 out of 100, Narrow moatNarrow moat
- #49DRI DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC.77.5 out of 100, Narrow moatNarrow moat
- #51CHH CHOICE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL INC /DE76.7 out of 100, Narrow moatNarrow moat
- #52URBN Urban Outfitters, Inc.76.5 out of 100, Narrow moatNarrow moat
Compare TDG with its nearest peers →All Consumer Discretionary companies on the Index →
Common questions about TDG
- Does TransDigm Group Incorporated have an economic moat?
- Based on its FY2025 SEC filings, the Moat Index scores TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) 77.5 out of 100 — a Narrow moat. The five questions behind that score begin at 20% each; if exactly one genuinely lacks data, the other four weights are renormalized and disclosed. revenue and EPS trend 100, pricing power 93, returns on capital 75, balance-sheet safety 40, capital discipline 80.
- How has TDG's Moat Score changed over time?
- The record logs 16 readings since Jul 17, 2026; the latest reads 77.5 out of 100 (narrow moat). No tier changes on record yet. (Methodology or normalizer upgrades on Jul 20, 2026, Jul 23, 2026, Jul 26, 2026 re-based the score; readings across versions aren't compared.) The history is append-only — readings are only ever added, never rewritten.