The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

AAL · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

JBLU · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

OLOX · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

SGLA · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureAALJBLUOLOXSGLA
Moat Score (0–100)1819 (highest)19 (highest)18
Methodology versionmoat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0
Business trend69 (highest)4621
Pricing power0 (highest)0 (highest)
Returns on capital37 (highest)00
Balance-sheet safety0028 (highest)28 (highest)
Capital discipline02444 (highest)44 (highest)
Price vs. high estimate608% above high estimateNo price dataNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$10.0B$2.0B$3.4M$485.4M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filings as ofFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025