The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
AGIG · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | AGIG | TROX | URG | LXU |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 13 | 14 (highest) | 14 (highest) | 13 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 0 | 39 (highest) | 18 | 28 |
| Pricing power | — | 8 (highest) | 0 | 0 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 (highest) | 0 | 28 (highest) | 12 |
| Capital discipline | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) | 20 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $38.0M | $943.4M | $457.6M | — |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |