The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

AIDX · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MSS · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

NEO · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

CANN · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureAIDXMSSNEOCANN
Moat Score (0–100)36 (highest)36 (highest)36 (highest)36 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0
Business trend7078 (highest)5962
Pricing power213567 (highest)65
Returns on capital0 (highest)0 (highest)0 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety28 (highest)28 (highest)28 (highest)28 (highest)
Capital discipline2437 (highest)2424
Price vs. high estimateNo price dataNo price dataNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$2.8M$1.8B$2.8M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filings as ofFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2023