The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
AISP · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
UPYY · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
MITK · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | AISP | UPYY | CLVT | MITK |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 50 (highest) | 50 (highest) | 50 (highest) | 50 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 48 | 23 | 67 | 76 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 73 | 86 | 100 (highest) | — |
| Returns on capital | — | — | 0 | 9 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 28 | 40 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 24 | 64 (highest) | 44 | 60 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 22% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data | No price data | 741% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $68.7M | $15.8M | $1.5B | $853.4M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |