The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

ALTI · Other · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

WHG · Other · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

SNEX · Other · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

RPC · Other · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureALTIWHGSNEXRPC
Moat Score (0–100)4045 (highest)4439
Methodology versionmoat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0
Business trend60524670 (highest)
Pricing power70
Returns on capital011 (highest)010
Balance-sheet safety55100 (highest)4
Capital discipline44186074 (highest)
Price vs. high estimateNo price dataNo price data37% above high estimateNo price data
Market cap$3.7B
Moat tierNo moatShallow moatShallow moatNo moat
Filings as ofFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025