The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
AN · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The capitalDiscipline component abstained: Not enough owner-earnings history to score capital discipline. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
LSEB · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
DRVN · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | AN | LSEB | DRVN | EVI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 42 | 43 (highest) | 43 (highest) | 42 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 50 | — | 82 (highest) | 60 |
| Pricing power | 28 | 93 (highest) | — | 34 |
| Returns on capital | 53 (highest) | 0 | 5 | 4 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 40 | 55 (highest) | 0 | 33 |
| Capital discipline | — | 24 | 84 (highest) | 80 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | 1989% above high estimate | No price data |
| Market cap | $7.3B | Not reported | $2.2B | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |