The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
AP · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
FRGT · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | AP | FRGT | CAPS | SCWO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 23 (highest) | 23 (highest) | 23 (highest) | 23 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 39 (highest) | 20 | 20 | 10 |
| Pricing power | — | — | 34 (highest) | 0 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | 9 (highest) | 4 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 28 | 28 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 24 | 45 (highest) | 24 | 44 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $156.0M | $7.7M | $2.2M | $35.8M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2025 |