The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ARKO · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ARKO | TNL | FOXF | DBI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 48 (highest) | 48 (highest) | 48 (highest) | 48 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 72 (highest) | 55 | 61 | 46 |
| Pricing power | — | 100 (highest) | 57 | 27 |
| Returns on capital | 35 | 45 | 71 | 73 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 20 | 1 | 28 | 51 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 64 (highest) | 40 | 24 | 40 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 52% above high estimate | 4% below high estimate | 48% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 38% below high estimate |
| Market cap | $859.2M | $4.5B | $767.9M | $279.1M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |