The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ASII · Consumer Staples · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
STZ · Consumer Staples · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ASII | STZ | BRCC | ZVIA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 42 | 43 (highest) | 42 | 42 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 70 (highest) | — | 63 | 53 |
| Pricing power | 26 | 85 (highest) | 56 | 77 |
| Returns on capital | — | 22 (highest) | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 23 | 28 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 44 | 42 | 64 (highest) | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $67880 | — | — | $110.2M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2023 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |