The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ATDS · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ATDS | IOT | CSGP | PENG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 52 (highest) | 52 (highest) | 52 (highest) | 52 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 57 | 62 | 83 (highest) | 69 |
| Pricing power | 79 | 99 | 100 (highest) | 26 |
| Returns on capital | — | 0 | 21 (highest) | 21 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 55 | 55 | 99 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 0 | 44 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | 262% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 538% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $72904 | $22.1B | $12.4B | $2.8B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |