The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ATVK · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
FOXO · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ATVK | FOXO | LVWR | CVS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 25 (highest) | 25 (highest) | 25 (highest) | 25 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 35 | — | 27 | 71 (highest) |
| Pricing power | — | 28 | 0 | 37 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 9 | 0 | 0 | 14 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 28 | 55 (highest) | 0 |
| Capital discipline | 28 | 44 (highest) | 42 | 0 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 7483% above high estimate | No price data | No price data | 91% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) |
| Market cap | $80.3M | $235.2M | $168.5M | $136.8B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |