The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
AWHL · Healthcare · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
AVR · Healthcare · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | AWHL | AVR | GH | CRMD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 64 | 20 | 60 | 78 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 32 | 70 | 99 (highest) | 11 |
| Returns on capital | — | — | 0 | 4 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 55 | 28 | 73 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 44 (highest) | 24 | 24 | 44 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | — | $341.8M | $19.3B | $616.6M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |