The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
AWK · Utilities · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
CPK · Utilities · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | AWK | CPK | SR | OGE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 38 (highest) | 38 (highest) | 38 (highest) | 38 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 73 | 83 (highest) | 64 | 50 |
| Pricing power | — | — | 80 | 86 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 2 | 5 (highest) | 0 | 5 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 3 | 4 (highest) | 1 | 2 |
| Capital discipline | 73 (highest) | 60 | 43 | 44 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 97% above high estimate | 6% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 91% above high estimate |
| Market cap | — | $3.2B | $4.8B | $10.0B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |