The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
BABB · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | BABB | BBY | BJRI | GIII |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 70 (highest) | 70 (highest) | 70 (highest) | 70 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 36 | 54 | 89 (highest) | 84 |
| Pricing power | — | 42 | 100 (highest) | 59 |
| Returns on capital | 97 | 100 (highest) | 10 | 42 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 93 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 46 | 54 | 57 | 63 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | 3% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 17% above high estimate | 565% above high estimate | No price data |
| Market cap | $6.0M | $17.8B | $1.5B | — |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2026 |