The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
BATRA · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
CNK · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | BATRA | FLZH | RDI | CNK |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 25 (highest) | 25 (highest) | 25 (highest) | 24 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 58 | 15 | 34 | 59 (highest) |
| Pricing power | — | 11 | 39 (highest) | — |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 55 (highest) | 0 | 0 |
| Capital discipline | 41 | 44 | 51 (highest) | 14 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $3.6B | $1.1M | $30.8M | — |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |