The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
BBGI · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
GLIBA · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | BBGI | SURG | GLIBA | HMMR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 27 (highest) | 27 (highest) | 27 (highest) | 26 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 48 (highest) | 46 | 36 | 27 |
| Pricing power | — | 0 | — | 26 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 7 | 18 (highest) | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 28 | 28 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 24 | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $37.8M | $6.8M | $668.7M | $7.6M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |