The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
BCC · Industrials · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | BCC | TTC | ITW | AIT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 74 (highest) | 74 (highest) | 74 (highest) | 73 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 68 | 83 | 61 | 85 (highest) |
| Pricing power | — | 59 | 72 (highest) | 22 |
| Returns on capital | 64 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 78 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 71 | 53 | 61 | 95 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 91 (highest) | 74 | 74 | 86 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 49% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 81% above high estimate | 44% above high estimate | 89% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $2.7B | $9.2B | $78.4B | $12.7B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |