The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
BH · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | BH | WEN | JACK | BARK |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 52 (highest) | 52 (highest) | 52 (highest) | 52 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 20 | 67 (highest) | 26 | 60 |
| Pricing power | 65 | 93 | 76 | 99 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | — | 18 | 92 (highest) | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 78 (highest) | 2 | 0 | 55 |
| Capital discipline | 44 | 78 (highest) | 64 | 44 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 66% below high estimate | 80% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data |
| Market cap | — | $1.5B | $277.8M | $81.0M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |