The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
BRGX · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | BRGX | SKKY | CARS | MAX |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 45 (highest) | 45 (highest) | 45 (highest) | 45 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 45 | 65 | 40 | 69 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 83 | 97 | 100 (highest) | 28 |
| Returns on capital | — | 0 | 1 | 66 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 28 | 64 (highest) | 0 |
| Capital discipline | 24 | 35 | 20 | 61 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 7054% above high estimate | 43% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data |
| Market cap | $7.4M | $26.0M | $701.9M | $953.0M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |