The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
BRLT · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
IMKTA · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
SMP · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
| Measure | BRLT | TDUP | IMKTA | SMP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) | 46 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 23 | 60 | — | 84 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 78 | 95 (highest) | 43 | 52 |
| Returns on capital | — | 0 | 28 | 49 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 55 | 56 (highest) | 14 |
| Capital discipline | 30 | 24 | 59 (highest) | 34 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 63% above high estimate | No price data | No price data | 62% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) |
| Market cap | $17.1M | $837.1M | — | $837.8M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |