The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
BSIN · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
ZONE · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | BSIN | ZONE | JELD | LXFR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 33 (highest) | 33 (highest) | 33 (highest) | 33 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 34 | — | 35 (highest) | 31 |
| Pricing power | — | 82 (highest) | 30 | 33 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | 10 | 24 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 28 | 28 | 57 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 44 | 24 | 64 (highest) | 21 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | 90% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 109% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $47.1M | $7.2M | $100.0M | $427.6M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |