The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
BYD · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
PAG · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
| Measure | BYD | TTEK | PAG | CRI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 67 (highest) | 67 (highest) | 67 (highest) | 66 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 83 | 95 (highest) | 71 | 66 |
| Pricing power | — | 20 | 28 | 74 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 44 | 73 | 56 | 97 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 40 | 57 | 80 (highest) | 55 |
| Capital discipline | 100 (highest) | 91 | 99 | 40 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 2% below high estimate | 58% above high estimate | 36% below high estimate | 47% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) |
| Market cap | $6.7B | $8.2B | $12.9B | $1.4B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |