The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
TKLS · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
HWH · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CCL | TKLS | RNGE | HWH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 33 (highest) | 33 (highest) | 33 (highest) | 33 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 85 (highest) | 60 | 35 | 20 |
| Pricing power | 35 | 0 | 24 | 59 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 15 (highest) | — | 6 | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 10 | 28 | 55 (highest) | 28 |
| Capital discipline | 17 | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | 577% above high estimate | No price data |
| Market cap | $32.6B | $63.2M | $77.5M | $10.6M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |