The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CIRX · Consumer Staples · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CIRX | CPB | LSF | IPST |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 36 | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) | 36 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 20 | 44 | 60 | 70 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 73 (highest) | 50 | 24 | 19 |
| Returns on capital | — | 40 (highest) | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 3 | 55 (highest) | 28 |
| Capital discipline | 24 | 47 | 44 | 64 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 30% below high estimate | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $148363 | $6.6B | $43.6M | $23.1M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |