The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CJAX · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CJAX | CODI | QUAD | ALB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 26 | 27 (highest) | 26 | 26 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 54 (highest) | 52 | 35 | 42 |
| Pricing power | — | 58 (highest) | 34 | 29 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | 13 | 25 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 0 | 31 (highest) | 0 |
| Capital discipline | 24 | 24 | 20 | 35 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | 36% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 913% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $50.3M | $752.4M | $429.6M | $13.9B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |