The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CLNN · Healthcare · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CLNN | ADUS | TALK | AMPH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 57 (highest) | 57 (highest) | 57 (highest) | 57 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 70 | 100 (highest) | 85 | 88 |
| Pricing power | 86 (highest) | 48 | 76 | 62 |
| Returns on capital | — | 12 | 0 | 19 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 65 | 100 (highest) | 32 |
| Capital discipline | 44 | 60 | 24 | 83 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 71% above high estimate | No price data | 58% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) |
| Market cap | $62.2M | $2.1B | $868.6M | $896.0M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |