The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CLRI · Communications · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
PLNT · Communications · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CLRI | PRKA | IDT | PLNT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 66 | 67 (highest) | 66 | 65 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 66 (highest) | 58 | 63 | — |
| Pricing power | 96 | 100 (highest) | 14 | 94 |
| Returns on capital | — | 77 | 95 (highest) | 81 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 78 | 73 | 100 (highest) | 6 |
| Capital discipline | 24 | 25 | 60 | 80 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | 97% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 264% above high estimate | 118% above high estimate | No price data |
| Market cap | $1.2M | $29.4M | $1.6B | — |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |