The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CMCSA · Communications · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
WMG · Communications · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
CPHC · Communications · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CMCSA | CALX | WMG | CPHC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 93 (highest) | 74 | — | 39 |
| Pricing power | — | 72 | 80 (highest) | — |
| Returns on capital | 20 | 7 | 57 (highest) | 56 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 100 (highest) | 14 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 79 (highest) | 24 | 69 | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 690% above high estimate | No price data | 3% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) |
| Market cap | — | $2.6B | — | $81.1M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |