The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CMCSA · Communications · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
MSGE · Communications · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
CPHC · Communications · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
NMAX · Communications · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CMCSA | MSGE | CPHC | NMAX |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 52 | 53 (highest) | 52 | 52 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 78 | 80 (highest) | 29 | 70 |
| Pricing power | — | — | — | 64 |
| Returns on capital | 20 | 63 (highest) | 56 | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 14 | 100 (highest) | 28 |
| Capital discipline | 79 (highest) | 57 | 24 | 44 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 786% above high estimate | 5% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data |
| Market cap | Not reported | $3.7B | $79.6M | $812M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |