The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CMG · Consumer Discretionary · Wide moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
LULU · Consumer Discretionary · Wide moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
TXRH · Consumer Discretionary · Wide moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
MEDP · Consumer Discretionary · Wide moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CMG | LULU | TXRH | MEDP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 95 | 97 (highest) | 97 (highest) | 94 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 87 | 94 | 96 (highest) | 85 |
| Pricing power | — | 92 | — | — |
| Returns on capital | 97 | 100 (highest) | 97 | 92 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 95 | 100 (highest) | 93 | 100 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | 216% above high estimate | 53% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 129% above high estimate | 194% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $43.1B | $13.0B | $12.9B | $15.0B |
| Moat tier | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |