The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CNK · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
BATRA · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CNK | RDI | BATRA | WYTC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 24 | 25 (highest) | 25 (highest) | 24 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 59 (highest) | 34 | 58 | 20 |
| Pricing power | — | 39 (highest) | — | 30 |
| Returns on capital | 24 (highest) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 14 | 51 (highest) | 41 | 44 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | — | $30.8M | $3.6B | $13.6M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2024 |