The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
COHR · Healthcare · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | COHR | MASS | ALNT | QURE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 60 | 69 | 79 (highest) | 53 |
| Pricing power | 59 | 87 | 53 | 96 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 15 (highest) | 0 | 13 | 7 |
| Balance-sheet safety | — | 55 (highest) | 31 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 55 | 24 | 60 (highest) | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 850% above high estimate | No price data | 177% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data |
| Market cap | $44.5B | $255.3M | $1.5B | $2.5B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |