The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
COHR · Healthcare · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | COHR | RYTM | PAHC | LEXX |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 46 (highest) | 46 (highest) | 46 (highest) | 46 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 55 | 60 (highest) | 59 | 60 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 59 | 98 (highest) | 56 | 70 |
| Returns on capital | 15 | 0 | 62 (highest) | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | — | 28 | 30 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 55 (highest) | 44 | 22 | 44 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 840% above high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $44.0B | $6.9B | Not reported | $10.9M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |