The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
COYA · Healthcare · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
GTHP · Healthcare · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
SRRK · Healthcare · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
ZYME · Healthcare · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | COYA | GTHP | SRRK | ZYME |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 40 | 53 | 60 (highest) | 54 |
| Pricing power | — | 15 | — | — |
| Returns on capital | 0 | — | 0 | 6 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 28 | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 24 | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $92.9M | $23.7M | $5.5B | $1.8B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |