The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
AVPT · Technology · Wide moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CRUS | ALLE | NSSC | AVPT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 81 | 82 (highest) | 82 (highest) | 81 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 74 | 96 (highest) | 95 | 80 |
| Pricing power | 87 | 74 | 45 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 97 | 100 (highest) | 90 | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 73 | 49 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 77 | 94 (highest) | 80 | 44 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 4% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 30% above high estimate | 323% above high estimate | No price data |
| Market cap | $6.8B | $13.2B | $1.3B | $2.6B |
| Moat tier | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat |
| Filings as of | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |