The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CTRN · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
WGO · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
SNBH · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CTRN | PKE | WGO | SNBH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 43 (highest) | 43 (highest) | 43 (highest) | 43 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 47 | 22 | 82 (highest) | 50 |
| Pricing power | — | 49 | 17 | 70 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 34 | 9 | 64 (highest) | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 51 | 100 (highest) | 13 | 28 |
| Capital discipline | 40 (highest) | 35 | 39 | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 847% above high estimate | 348% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $547.9M | $681.9M | — | $1.2M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2026 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |