The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CVLG · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CVLG | RYZ | SKYX | FLR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 25 (highest) | 25 (highest) | 25 (highest) | 25 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 59 | 35 | 63 (highest) | 33 |
| Pricing power | — | 30 (highest) | 12 | 0 |
| Returns on capital | 10 | 38 (highest) | 0 | 12 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 13 | 0 | 28 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 20 | 24 | 24 | 26 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | 113% above high estimate | 8% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data | 387% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $1.3B | $1.5B | $143.6M | $7.5B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |