The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

CXAI · Technology · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

GBUX · Technology · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

TACT · Technology · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

SPTY · Technology · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureCXAIGBUXTACTSPTY
Moat Score (0–100)38 (highest)38 (highest)38 (highest)38 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend57 (highest)4931
Pricing power98 (highest)427367
Returns on capital014 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety28 (highest)28 (highest)28 (highest)28 (highest)
Capital discipline24 (highest)24 (highest)24 (highest)24 (highest)
Price vs. high estimateNo price dataNo price dataNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$7M$39625$52.1M$4.6M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filings as ofFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025