The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
DASH · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | DASH | UPWK | FDCTD | TBLA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 58 (highest) | 58 (highest) | 58 (highest) | 58 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 82 (highest) | 72 | 81 | 81 |
| Pricing power | — | 96 (highest) | 53 | 49 |
| Returns on capital | 6 | 4 | 12 (highest) | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 94 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 44 | 24 | 44 | 60 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 97% above high estimate | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $83.1B | $1.2B | — | — |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |