The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
STWI · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | DGII | TBLA | STWI | INOD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 57 (highest) | 57 (highest) | 57 (highest) | 57 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 92 (highest) | 77 | 50 | 80 |
| Pricing power | 81 | 49 | 100 (highest) | 66 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | — | 14 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 51 | 100 (highest) | 55 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 60 (highest) | 60 (highest) | 24 | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 164% above high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $2.5B | Not reported | Not reported | $1.8B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |