The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
DNUT · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | DNUT | SDOT | EVH | TITN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 26 | 27 (highest) | 26 | 26 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 53 | 57 | 58 (highest) | 51 |
| Pricing power | — | 0 | 22 | 28 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 5 | 0 | 20 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | 0 |
| Capital discipline | 24 | 44 (highest) | 24 | 30 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data | 39% below high estimate |
| Market cap | $549.0M | $40.5M | $662.0M | $447.4M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |