The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
DTGI · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | DTGI | NABL | ASUR | ZDGE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 61 | 63 (highest) | 61 | 54 |
| Pricing power | 54 | 99 (highest) | 90 | 70 |
| Returns on capital | — | 0 | 0 | 11 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 52 | 23 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 44 | 20 | 60 (highest) | 44 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 191% above high estimate | 106% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data |
| Market cap | $659820 | $914.8M | $221.8M | — |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2023 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |